Now showing 1 - 10 of 19
  • Publication
    Current issues related to anthropometry in engineering
    Anthropos and Metrikos both mean "human" in Greek, which is where the term anthropometry comes from. Anthropometry is employed in a variety of fields, including apparel and textile design. For anthropometric evaluations, a current, thorough, and community-specific anthropometric normative-reference standard is necessary. In health care, ergonomic design is utilised to reduce pain and illness. Misalignments between humans and machines result in pain, accidents, biomechanical stress, tiredness, and musculoskeletal injuries. Designing for the anthropometrics of end users improves long-term viability. The human body comes in a wide range of sizes and shapes. Manual measurement and 3D scanning procedures, on the other hand, are inefficient and expensive, making precise body measurements difficult. This is especially true for head-worn medical devices. Manual measurement and 3D scanning are inefficient and expensive, making precise body measurements difficult. Grip strength and force were determined using hand measurements. Anthropometric parameter estimate is more precise when a 3D model is used to boost pinnae features. While numerous anatomical features have been gathered to aid in the ergonomic design of wearable devices, there is still a lot more work to be done. In three dimensions, the segment masses and torso Centre of Mass (COM) may be calculated. Researchers tracking mobility would benefit greatly from the ability to locate the body COM using a weighted sum of segment masses. Design features such as comfort and usefulness are crucial. Ergonomic characteristics like taller seats with front slopes and saddle chairs encourage good posture, movement, and alternation. In the creation of wearable technologies, using outdated anthropometric reference standards may be insufficient. This review discuses common issues related to anthropometry in engineering which includes the human body, anthropometric parameters, anthropometric measurements, the force plate method, ergonomic design, and body dimension. The goal is to give a broad overview of the subject.
  • Publication
    Current issues related to biomechanics in engineering
    Motion capture was employed by Eadweard Muybridge and Etienne-Jules Marey. Industry standard for computing joint kinematics is motion capture. Kinematic analysis is a technique used in biomechanics and mechanical engineering to quantify stiff body motion. A joint moment can be computed in one of two ways: bottom-up or top-down. Joint moments measure muscle and joint tension indirectly. Researchers predicted joint moments using kinematic-based characteristics and machine learning outside of the biomechanics lab.Ankle osteoarthritis causes significant biomechanical issues in the foot and lower leg. Patients' 3D multi-segment kinematic foot models were studied. The technique used is Openpose, which recognises the human body from a single photograph.Falling fear is linked to decreased activity, despondency, and anxiety in the elderly. They adopt a hip approach to manage their GRFs and balance. The lateral ankle technique corrects minor foot placement problems by swiftly moving the pressure point. Angular momentum is affected by foot placement and ground reaction forces. Changing the body's centre of mass along a curved trajectory implies large changes in both ground reaction force impulses and ground reaction force.Lens stiffness and a ciliary muscle anterior/inward displacement produce presbyopia. By 55, the majority of folks have lost their ability to accommodate. Cataracts become common around this time, reaching over 70% by 75. The circumferential and meridional stiffnesses rose with anisotropy from pole to equator, but dropped with distance. The Holzapfel model accurately fits the data from inflation and uniaxial mechanical tests.Anatomical motions of the femur during knee flexion were examined. The data revealed morphological and physiological knee kinematic characteristics. The data led to several hypotheses about axial femoral condyle rotation. This review discusses lower limbs, foot positioning, lens capsule, femoral condyle, muscle activation, collagen fibre, knee joint, and walking speed. The purpose is to provide a general overview on the subject matter.
  • Publication
    Beyond comfort ergonomics in engineering education and design
    In "Beyond Comfort: Ergonomics in Engineering Education and Design," this review looks at how ergonomic points help make health care places better. It checks how training programs can help reduce hard physical work troubles and stop bone and muscle problems. In terms of teaching, the paper looks at how ergonomic ideas are added into courses, focusing on new teaching ways for better worker performance. It also talks about differences in new learning places, like learning through computer-made realities, and old-style classrooms in engineering teaching. The paper points out many ergonomic problems professionals face in different areas like health care during big health crises, building places, farm work, and fixing railway systems. There are also talks of new tools and changes, like better wheelbarrows and different hospital beds, to make things easy and safe for users. The main idea of the book is to talk about the design and change of tools, work systems, and teaching plans to make ergonomics strong, reduce health problems, and make work output better.
  • Publication
    Musculoskeletal disorders industrial insights and ergonomic interventions
    In response to the rising incidence of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) across diverse work environments, extensive research has been undertaken. Within the apparel sector, initiatives have included workstation redesigns to alleviate worker strain. Emphasis has also been placed on formulating explicit ergonomic risk assessment standards, particularly for roles associated with heavy machinery, exemplified by container terminal operators. The agricultural domain, particularly manual farming activities in Haryana, India, has been studied to comprehend the distinct challenges encountered. The ergonomic implications for fish processing laborers, subjected to cold, damp conditions and repetitive tasks, have also been examined. Notably, the integration of biomechanics instrumentation in occupational health offers insights into refining human work-related movements for improved health. Scrutiny has been extended to varied workplaces, like flour production units and oil and gas enterprises, to discern MSD origins and propose corrective measures. With technological advancements, ergonomics now employs sophisticated tools such as computerized dynamometers for precise risk evaluations. Detailed biomechanics assessments further elucidate the physical demands on workers. Other industries, including textiles, have seen ergonomic appraisals aiming to diminish manual task strains, while the laborintensive dairy farming sector has also been evaluated. Cumulatively, these comprehensive research endeavors pave the way for a more informed approach, suggesting preventive and mitigative strategies against MSDs across sectors.
  • Publication
    Human-centered ergonomic: advancements, challenges, and future directions in industrial and occupational settings
    The field of human-centered ergonomics has evolved significantly, especially in industrial and occupational settings, where the focus is on optimizing worker performance and well-being through the integration of advanced technologies. This review paper explores the key advancements, challenges, and future directions in ergonomics as they relate to Industry 4.0, cognitive ergonomics, aging workforces, and sustainable manufacturing. With the rise of Industry 4.0, technologies such as motion capture, virtual reality, and autonomous systems have proven to be invaluable tools in addressing ergonomic risks while improving productivity. These innovations enable better task design and human-machine interactions, reducing both physical strain and cognitive load. However, the integration of technology also presents challenges, particularly for the aging workforce, which is more susceptible to ergonomic stressors. Ergonomic interventions such as assistive devices, like exoskeletons, and tailored workspace designs are critical for maintaining productivity and health among older workers. Furthermore, the review discusses the role of ergonomics in sustainable manufacturing, highlighting how ergonomic principles contribute to environmental goals by reducing energy consumption, waste, and physical strain. Cognitive ergonomics, which addresses mental workload and human-computer interaction, is another crucial area explored in this paper. As automation increases, optimizing human cognitive performance is essential to reducing errors and enhancing safety in complex work environments. In conclusion, while advancements in technology offer promising solutions to many ergonomic challenges, the future of human-centered ergonomics will require continued research and innovation to address the evolving needs of workers in diverse and technologically advanced environments. The ongoing development of ergonomic interventions that balance human well-being with industrial efficiency will remain central to the future of work.
  • Publication
    Current trends and risk factors in low back pain: an ergonomic perspective on prevention and management
    Low back pain (LBP) is a global health concern, impacting individuals across various professions and age groups. This review explores the critical role of ergonomic factors in the prevention and management of LBP. Occupational risk factors, including heavy lifting, prolonged sitting, non-neutral postures, and repetitive motions, contribute significantly to the rising prevalence of LBP. Professions such as healthcare, law enforcement, and office work are particularly vulnerable due to their physical demands and static postures. Ergonomic interventions, including task redesign, assistive technologies, and workplace modifications, have proven effective in reducing the incidence of LBP. Dynamic seating, lumbar support devices, and wearable technology are among the innovations that have been introduced to promote healthier postures and reduce musculoskeletal strain. Additionally, ergonomic training programs focusing on proper body mechanics and posture correction are essential for long-term prevention. Beyond physical factors, psychosocial and lifestyle elements, such as stress, sedentary behavior, and smoking, also play a role in the development of LBP. Combining ergonomic interventions with health-promoting behaviors, such as regular physical activity and stress management, can significantly reduce the burden of LBP. Technological advancements, including mobile applications and wearable devices, support adherence to home exercise programs, offering continuous feedback for posture correction and movement. This comprehensive review underscores the need for a multidisciplinary approach that integrates ergonomic interventions, technological tools, and lifestyle modifications to manage and prevent LBP effectively in both occupational and everyday settings.
      25  2
  • Publication
    Recent advancements in ergonomic risk assessment integration of artificial intelligence, wearable technology, and industry-specific approaches
    Ergonomic risk assessment is crucial in preventing work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) across various industries. Traditional methods, while effective, have limitations, such as reliance on manual observations and a lack of real-time monitoring. Recent technological advancements, including artificial intelligence (AI), wearable sensors, and industry-specific solutions, are addressing these gaps. AI and machine learning techniques enable real-time data analysis, providing more accurate and proactive ergonomic assessments. Wearable technology, such as inertial measurement units and pressure sensors, offers continuous monitoring of worker movements and postures, helping to prevent injuries in sectors like healthcare, construction, and manufacturing. These tools also allow for personalized ergonomic interventions by assessing individual risk factors in real-time. Industry-specific approaches have also emerged, particularly in high-risk fields such as healthcare and mining, where the integration of ergonomic and psychosocial stressors provides a comprehensive risk assessment model. In addition to physical ergonomics, advancements now incorporate psychosocial factors, addressing issues like organizational culture and job stress, which significantly influence musculoskeletal health. Finally, technological innovations such as simulation and modeling tools further enhance ergonomic assessments by simulating worker movements and identifying high-risk postures. However, challenges remain in standardizing these tools and integrating them into existing workflows. The evolution of ergonomic risk assessments towards more automated, precise, and real-time systems promises to reduce WMSDs and improve overall workplace safety.
      14  1
  • Publication
    Innovations in ergonomic risk assessment and intervention in material handling
    This review paper delves into the complex facets of ergonomic risk evaluation and reduction across various industrial sectors. The focus is on identifying the hazards linked to manual labor, especially those contributing to physical risks and musculoskeletal disorders among workers, and proposing inventive solutions to mitigate these threats. The review brings together insights from different studies, emphasizing the application of automation, virtual modeling, Kinect-based evaluations, and other innovative tools in repetitive tasks and material handling operations. It also explores the usage of back-support exoskeletons, observational checklists, and workspace redesigns to decrease risks in construction, manufacturing, vegetable transportation, clothing accessories, and other sectors. The development of risk assessment frameworks for specific roles such as container terminal operators and the examination of musculoskeletal disorders in diverse worker demographics, including older female farmers and factory workers, are also featured. The comprehensive approach of the journal sets the stage for future research, aiming to further reduce the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders through continued innovation and cross-sector collaboration.
      3  37
  • Publication
    Review on current issues related to work related musculoskeletal disorders
    Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are one of the most common occupational ailments in recent decades, significantly limiting people's daily lives. Globally, WMSDs are the major cause of employee pain, impairment, absenteeism, reduced productivity, and large financial costs. WRMSDs are illnesses that develop over time because of long-term occupational exposure to varying-intensity loads. WRMSDs are produced by discomfort or injury to the muscles and bones of the upper limbs because of activity. Low-extremity illnesses, like upper-limb diseases, may be just as dangerous, There is a high prevalence of neck and upper extremity problems among computer users. Upper extremities diseases were more common in older personnel. The physiological outcome of prolonged, repetitive, or repeating muscle contractions with insufficient recovery is localised muscular fatigue (WMSDs). Muscle tiredness has a substantial impact on occupational task performance, hence preventing it is crucial. The key challenge in ergonomics is to create work that avoids WMSDs while retaining high levels of output quality and productivity. Uncomfortable postures are commonly recognised as a major contributor of MSD among construction workers. Because of their linearity, ergonomic metrics can be incorporated into assembly line design models. They can also be utilised to take use of efficient solution methods established for optimal line design which are beneficial in the assembly line industry. Real-time risk assessment for work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) has proven to be challenging to research. Working at a fast speed and performing repetitive activities, as well as maintaining non-neutral body postures, are all physical risk factors for WMSDs. This review discuses common issue related to WMSDs which includes upper extremity, upper limbs, carpal tunnel syndrome, awkward postures, muscle activity, muscle fatigue, assembly line and risk assessment. The aim is to provide an overview of the problems related to the subject matter.
      16  6
  • Publication
    Determining the Potential of Layered Banana Fibre Weave Patterns for Enhanced Blast Resistance in Bomb Blankets
    (Universiti Malaysia Perlis, 2025-06-10)
    Abdul Rashid Othman
    ;
    ; ;
    Siti Aisyah Azman
    The banana fibre is part of research aimed at creating materials for weaving bomb blankets. To determine whether plain and intra-ply woven banana fibre designs are feasible and effective in enhancing blast resistance, the primary purpose of this research is to analyse the practicability and efficiency of these designs. The method begins with extracting banana fibres, followed by applying an alkali treatment to enhance the mechanical properties of the fibres, and finally concludes with weaving the fibres into plain and intra-ply patterns. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) technique was utilized to analyse the surface morphology and assess any damage that occurred as a result of the blast. Based on the findings, it was shown that plain woven banana fibres demonstrated greater tensile strength (7.39 MPa) and energy absorption (11,772 J) compared to intra-ply woven patterns. The SEM analysis indicated that plain woven fibres had a lower number of surface flaws, highlighting their increased resistance to explosive forces. In conclusion, plain woven banana fibres have significant potential to serve as an alternative to synthetic materials for blast-resistant applications. This alternative is not only cost-effective but also environmentally friendly. Therefore, it is possible for them to meet standards in terms of both environmental sustainability and security.
      5  35