Home
  • English
  • ÄŒeÅ¡tina
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • LatvieÅ¡u
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
Home
  • Browse Our Collections
  • Publications
  • Researchers
  • Research Data
  • Institutions
  • Statistics
    • English
    • ÄŒeÅ¡tina
    • Deutsch
    • Español
    • Français
    • Gàidhlig
    • LatvieÅ¡u
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Português
    • Português do Brasil
    • Suomi
    • Log In
      New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Resources
  3. UniMAP Index Publications
  4. Publications 2020
  5. Comparative Study between Wearable Sensor and Cuff Arm Blood Pressure Meter in Measuring Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Monitor Using Statistical Approach
 
Options

Comparative Study between Wearable Sensor and Cuff Arm Blood Pressure Meter in Measuring Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Monitor Using Statistical Approach

Journal
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
ISSN
17426588
Date Issued
2020-06-17
Author(s)
Cheng Ee Meng
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
Lim E.A.
Tan W.H.
Mustafa W.A.
Syed Zulkarnain Syed Idrus
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
Nashrul Fazli Mohd Nasir
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
Abdulmalek M.
Beh H.G.
Lee Y.S.
Mou Yusop S.N.A.
DOI
10.1088/1742-6596/1529/2/022082
Handle (URI)
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14170/6390
Abstract
Heart rate and blood pressure monitoring during physical activity and exercise allow early diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and obesity. Plethysmography(PPG) has become popular worldwide for personal health monitoring systems. However, the accuracy of this technology in monitoring heart rate and blood pressure during activity is poorer than at rest. It limits their application. In this study, the performance of the wearable sensor and arm cuff blood pressure meter in measuring heart rate and blood pressure on the left arm is compared. Five healthy volunteers conducted the same exercise protocols, i.e., at rest, jump rope, treadmill walking, running (long run) and sprinting (short-run). The wearable sensor shows a mean absolute percentage error in 6.08% and Pearson coefficient in 0.61. Besides, the lowest range of 95% limit of agreement for diastolic blood pressure during treadmill run was found at 30.50.
File(s)
Research repository notification.pdf (4.4 MB)
google-scholar
Views
Downloads
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Policies