Home
  • English
  • ÄŒeÅ¡tina
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • LatvieÅ¡u
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
Home
  • Browse Our Collections
  • Publications
  • Researchers
  • Research Data
  • Institutions
  • Statistics
    • English
    • ÄŒeÅ¡tina
    • Deutsch
    • Español
    • Français
    • Gàidhlig
    • LatvieÅ¡u
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Português
    • Português do Brasil
    • Suomi
    • Log In
      New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Research Output and Publications
  3. Faculty of Chemical Engineering & Technology
  4. Journal Articles
  5. Phase analysis of different liquid ratio on Metakaolin/Dolomite geopolymer
 
Options

Phase analysis of different liquid ratio on Metakaolin/Dolomite geopolymer

Journal
Archives of Metallurgy and Materials
ISSN
2300-1909
Date Issued
2021
Author(s)
Ahmad Syauqi Sauffi
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
Wan Mastura Wan Ibrahim
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
Mohd. Mustafa Al Bakri Abdullah
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
Masdiyana Ibrahim
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
Romisuhani Ahmad
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
Fakhryna Ahmad Zaidi
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
DOI
10.24425/amm.2022.137497
Abstract
Geopolymer is widely studied nowadays in various scope of studies. Some of the ongoing studies are the study of the various materials towards the geopolymer strength produced. Meanwhile, some of the studies focus on the mixing of the geopolymer itself. This paper discussed the phase analysis of metakaolin/dolomite geopolymer for different solid to the liquid ratio which was, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0, and the properties that affected the geopolymer based on the phases. The constant parameters in this study were the percentage of metakaolin and dolomite used. The metakaolin used was 80% meanwhile dolomite usage was 20%. Besides that, the molarity of NaOH used is 10M and the alkaline activator ratio used is 2.0. All the samples were tested at 28 days of curing. The results show that the 0.8 solid to the liquid ratio used gave better properties compare to other solid to liquid ratio. The phases analyzed were quartz, sillimanite, mullite, and faujasite. The 0.8 S/L ratio shows the better properties compared to others by the test of phase analysis, compressive strength morphology analysis, and functional group analysis.
Subjects
  • Geopolymer

  • Metakaolin

  • Dolomite

  • Phase Analysis

File(s)
Phase Analysis of Different Liquid Ratio.pdf (2.54 MB)
google-scholar
Views
Downloads
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Policies