Home
  • English
  • ÄŒeÅ¡tina
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • LatvieÅ¡u
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
Home
  • Browse Our Collections
  • Publications
  • Researchers
  • Research Data
  • Institutions
  • Statistics
    • English
    • ÄŒeÅ¡tina
    • Deutsch
    • Español
    • Français
    • Gàidhlig
    • LatvieÅ¡u
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Português
    • Português do Brasil
    • Suomi
    • Log In
      New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Resources
  3. UniMAP Index Publications
  4. Publications 2022
  5. Effect of direct statistical contrast enhancement technique on document image binarization
 
Options

Effect of direct statistical contrast enhancement technique on document image binarization

Journal
Computers, Materials and Continua
ISSN
15462218
Date Issued
2022-01-01
Author(s)
Wan Azani Wan Mustafa
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
Haniza Yazid
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
Alkhayyat A.
Mohd Aminudin Jamlos
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
Hasliza A Rahim @ Samsuddin
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
DOI
10.32604/cmc.2022.019801
Handle (URI)
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14170/5912
Abstract
Background: Contrast enhancement plays an important role in the image processing field. Contrast correction has performed an adjustment on the darkness or brightness of the input image and increases the quality of the image. Objective: This paper proposed a novel method based on statistical data from the local mean and local standard deviation. Method: The proposed method modifies the mean and standard deviation of a neighbourhood at each pixel and divides it into three categories: background, foreground, and problematic (contrast & luminosity) region. Experimental results from both visual and objective aspects show that the proposed method can normalize the contrast variation problem effectively compared to Histogram Equalization (HE), Difference of Gaussian (DoG), and Butterworth Homomorphic Filtering (BHF). Seven (7) types of binarization methods were tested on the corrected image and produced a positive and impressive result. Result: Finally, a comparison in terms of Signal Noise Ratio (SNR), Misclassification Error (ME), F-measure, Peak Signal Noise Ratio (PSNR), Misclassification Penalty Metric (MPM), and Accuracy was calculated. Each binarization method shows an incremented result after applying it onto the corrected image compared to the original image. The SNR result of our proposed image is 9.350 higher than the three (3) other methods. The average increment after five (5) types of evaluation are: (Otsu = 41.64%, Local Adaptive = 7.05%, Niblack = 30.28%, Bernsen = 25%, Bradley = 3.54%, Nick = 1.59%, Gradient-Based = 14.6%). Conclusion: The results presented in this paper effectively solve the contrast problem and finally produce better quality images.
Subjects
  • Binarization | Contra...

File(s)
Research repository notification.pdf (4.4 MB)
Views
1
Acquisition Date
Mar 5, 2026
View Details
Downloads
21
Acquisition Date
Mar 5, 2026
View Details
google-scholar
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Policies