Home
  • English
  • ÄŒeÅ¡tina
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • LatvieÅ¡u
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
Home
  • Browse Our Collections
  • Publications
  • Researchers
  • Research Data
  • Institutions
  • Statistics
    • English
    • ÄŒeÅ¡tina
    • Deutsch
    • Español
    • Français
    • Gàidhlig
    • LatvieÅ¡u
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Português
    • Português do Brasil
    • Suomi
    • Log In
      New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Resources
  3. Journals
  4. Journal of Engineering Research and Education (JERE)
  5. Alternative assessment for enhancing complex problem-solving skills in mechanical system design course
 
Options

Alternative assessment for enhancing complex problem-solving skills in mechanical system design course

Journal
Journal of Engineering Research and Education (JERE)
ISSN
2232-1098
Date Issued
2024
Author(s)
Khairul Salleh Basaruddin
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58915/jere.v16.2024.1665
Handle (URI)
https://ejournal.unimap.edu.my/index.php/jere/article/view/1665/1040
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14170/15907
Abstract
Traditional assessment methods in engineering education, such as exam-based evaluations, often fail to adequately measure complex problem-solving skills and practical application of knowledge, necessitating the exploration of innovative assessment approaches. This paper introduces the Constructive-Teamwork-Experiential-Presentation (CTEP), an alternative assessment approach applied in the Mechanical System Design course (ENT348) for undergraduate mechanical engineering students. The CTEP model is tailored to enhance complex problem-solving (CPS) abilities and engage students in complex engineering activities (CEA). It aligns with the 2020 standards of the Engineering Accreditation Council (EAC) and the Malaysian Qualifications Framework (MQF) 2.0, specifically addressing Programme Outcomes (PO) 3 (Design) and PO10 (Communication). Over four academic terms, this model incorporated interactive design tasks, collaborative teamwork, simulation exercises, and student presentations. The findings indicate notable improvements in achieving PO3 and PO10, with average attainment rates rising to 80% and 78%, respectively. Beyond academic achievements, the model also supported the development of essential skills such as creativity, collaboration, and effective communication. Challenges related to time management and limited resources were mitigated through guided supervision and institutional backing. Future studies aim to evaluate the potential of extending the CTEP model to other engineering disciplines.
Subjects
  • Alternative assessmen...

  • Complex problem-solvi...

  • Constructive alignmen...

  • Engineering education...

  • Mechanical system des...

  • Experiential learning...

File(s)
11+Alternative_Assessment_for_Enhancing_Complex_Problem-Solving_Skills_in_Mechanical_System_Design_Course (1).pdf (618.07 KB)
Views
2
Acquisition Date
Mar 5, 2026
View Details
google-scholar
Downloads
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Policies