Options
Shayfull Zamree Abd. Rahim
Preferred name
Shayfull Zamree Abd. Rahim
Official Name
Shayfull Zamree, Abd. Rahim
Alternative Name
Shayfull, Zamree Abd Rahim
Abd Rahim, Shayfull Zamree Abd
Shayfull, Zamree
Abd Rahim, S. Z.
Abd Rahim, Shayfull Zamree Bin
Bin Abd Rahim, S. Zamree
Abd Rahim, S.
zamree bin abd Rahim, Shayfull
Rahim, Shayfull Zamree Abd
Zamree Abd Rahim, Shayfull
Zambree, Shayfull
Rahim, Shayfull Z.B.Abd
Zamree, A. R.Shayfull
Shayfull, Z.
Main Affiliation
Scopus Author ID
54941291700
Researcher ID
I-2840-2019
Now showing
1 - 2 of 2
-
PublicationInfluence of filler surface modification on static and dynamic mechanical responses of rice husk reinforced linear low-density polyethylene composites( 2021)
;B. Jeż ;M. Nabiałek ;Hazizan Md AkilFiller surface modification has become an essential approach to improve the compatibility problem between natural fillers and polymer matrices. However, there is limited work that concerns on this particular effect under dynamic loading conditions. Therefore, in this study, both untreated and treated low linear density polyethylene/rice husk composites were tested under static (0.001 s –1, 0.01 s –1 and 0.1 s –1) and dynamic loading rates (650 s –1, 900 s –1 and 1100 s –1) using universal testing machine and split Hopkinson pressure bar equipment, respectively. Rice husk filler was modified using silane coupling agents at four different concentrations (1, 3, 5 and 7% weight percentage of silane) at room temperature. This surface modification was experimentally proven by Fourier transform infrared and Field emission scanning electron microscopy. Results show that strength properties, stiffness properties and yield behaviour of treated composites were higher than untreated composites. Among the treated composites, the 5% silane weight percentage composite shows the optimum mechanical properties. Besides, the rate of sensitivity of both untreated and treated composites also shows great dependency on strain rate sensitivity with increasing strain rate. On the other hand, the thermal activation volume shows contrary trend. For fracture surface analysis, the results show that the treated LLDPE/RH composites experienced less permanent deformation as compared to untreated LLDPE/RH composites. Besides, at dynamic loading, the fracture surface analysis of the treated composites showed good attachment between RH and LLDPE.11 2 -
PublicationInfluence of filler surface modification on static and dynamic mechanical responses of rice husk reinforced linear low-density polyethylene composites( 2021)
;B. Jeż ;M. Nabiałek ;Hazizan Md AkilFiller surface modification has become an essential approach to improve the compatibility problem between natural fillers and polymer matrices. However, there is limited work that concerns on this particular effect under dynamic loading conditions. Therefore, in this study, both untreated and treated low linear density polyethylene/rice husk composites were tested under static (0.001 s–1, 0.01 s–1 and 0.1 s–1) and dynamic loading rates (650 s–1, 900 s–1 and 1100 s–1) using universal testing machine and split Hopkinson pressure bar equipment, respectively. Rice husk filler was modified using silane coupling agents at four different concentrations (1, 3, 5 and 7% weight percentage of silane) at room temperature. This surface modification was experimentally proven by Fourier transform infrared and Field emission scanning electron microscopy. Results show that strength properties, stiffness properties and yield behaviour of treated composites were higher than untreated composites. Among the treated composites, the 5% silane weight percentage composite shows the optimum mechanical properties. Besides, the rate of sensitivity of both untreated and treated composites also shows great dependency on strain rate sensitivity with increasing strain rate. On the other hand, the thermal activation volume shows contrary trend. For fracture surface analysis, the results show that the treated LLDPE/RH composites experienced less permanent deformation as compared to untreated LLDPE/RH composites. Besides, at dynamic loading, the fracture surface analysis of the treated composites showed good attachment between RH and LLDPE.11 3