Home
  • English
  • ÄŒeÅ¡tina
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • LatvieÅ¡u
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
Home
  • Browse Our Collections
  • Publications
  • Researchers
  • Research Data
  • Institutions
  • Statistics
    • English
    • ÄŒeÅ¡tina
    • Deutsch
    • Español
    • Français
    • Gàidhlig
    • LatvieÅ¡u
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Português
    • Português do Brasil
    • Suomi
    • Log In
      New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Resources
  3. UniMAP Index Publications
  4. Publications 2019
  5. Redesign of drone remote control using design for manufacturing and assembly (DFMA) method
 
Options

Redesign of drone remote control using design for manufacturing and assembly (DFMA) method

Journal
AIP Conference Proceedings
ISSN
0094243X
Date Issued
2019-07-30
Author(s)
Xin T.J.
Muhamad Farizuan Rosli
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
Radhwan Hussin
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
Shayfull Zamree Abd. Rahim
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
Mohd Fathullah Ghazli@Ghazali
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
DOI
10.1063/1.5118167
Abstract
"The redesign of drone remote control using DFMA method" is a case study to analyze and redesigned the controller product through its assembly process in term of manual handling time, manual insertion time, total assembly time, design efficiency of the design and manufacturing method for the design. The components and manufacturing of the drone remote control were undergone alteration with design for manufacturing and assembly (DFMA) and redesigned methods. The main focuses of this research are to analyze the current design efficiency of drone remote control and improved the design efficiency. At the same time, the redesign was applied to existing model under the same platform. As a result, the assembly time for redesign showed an improvement of 24.93% where the assembly time was reduced from 480.56 s to 360.79 s and design efficiency was increased 1.66% from 4.99% to 6.65%. Therefore, the best design with optimal value is accomplished.
File(s)
Research repository notification.pdf (4.4 MB)
google-scholar
Views
Downloads
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Policies