Home
  • English
  • ÄŒeÅ¡tina
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • LatvieÅ¡u
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
Home
  • Browse Our Collections
  • Publications
  • Researchers
  • Research Data
  • Institutions
  • Statistics
    • English
    • ÄŒeÅ¡tina
    • Deutsch
    • Español
    • Français
    • Gàidhlig
    • LatvieÅ¡u
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Português
    • Português do Brasil
    • Suomi
    • Log In
      New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Resources
  3. Journals
  4. Journal of Engineering Research and Education (JERE)
  5. Microstructure, Properties and Fracture Mechanism of AI 2014 Reinforced with Alumina Particles
 
Options

Microstructure, Properties and Fracture Mechanism of AI 2014 Reinforced with Alumina Particles

Journal
Journal of Engineering Research and Education (JERE)
ISSN
1823-2981
Date Issued
2004
Author(s)
Mazlee Mohd Noor
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
Shamsul Baharin Jamaludin
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
Abstract
The studies of microstructure, properties and fracture mechanism have been conducted on AI 2014 matrix alloy reinforced with 10 volume percent (Composite 1) and 15 volume percent (Composite 2) of alumina (A/20 3) particles respectively Microstructure observation of the composite specimens was focused on the distribution of alumina reinforcement particles in different orientations. It was found that Composite 1 showed a more evenly distributed particles compared to that of Composite 2. The measurement of sonic modulus was carried out by using GrindoSonic MK5 Industria/Instrument. All the sonic modulus properties (flexural, longitudinal and torsional moduli) of Composite 2 were found to be higher than Composite 1. The testing of impact strength was done by means of Charpy impact test (V-notched specimen). It has found that the impact strength of Composite 1 (5.42 J) was higher as compared to Composite 2 (4.07 J). The fracture surfaces after impact test for the composite samples were investigated by using scanning electron microscopy in order to characterise the fracture mechanism of the composites. The fracture mechanism of Composite 1 was indicated by matrix ductile rupture and decohesion of particle-matrix interface, whereas matrix brittle rupture by particle fracture was found in Composite 2.
Subjects
  • AI 2014

  • Alumina

  • Microstructure

  • Sonic modulus

  • Impact test

  • Decohesion

  • Particle fracture

File(s)
Microstructure, Properties and Fracture Mechanism.pdf (1.16 MB)
Views
18
Acquisition Date
Nov 19, 2024
View Details
Downloads
14
Acquisition Date
Nov 19, 2024
View Details
google-scholar
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Policies