Home
  • English
  • ÄŒeÅ¡tina
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • LatvieÅ¡u
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
Home
  • Browse Our Collections
  • Publications
  • Researchers
  • Research Data
  • Institutions
  • Statistics
    • English
    • ÄŒeÅ¡tina
    • Deutsch
    • Español
    • Français
    • Gàidhlig
    • LatvieÅ¡u
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Português
    • Português do Brasil
    • Suomi
    • Log In
      New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Resources
  3. UniMAP Index Publications
  4. Publications 2021
  5. Comparison between predicted results and built-in classification results for brain-computer interface (BCI) system
 
Options

Comparison between predicted results and built-in classification results for brain-computer interface (BCI) system

Journal
AIP Conference Proceedings
ISSN
0094243X
Date Issued
2021-05-03
Author(s)
Ong Z.Y.
Saidatul Ardeenawatie Awang
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
Vikneswaran Vijean
Universiti Malaysia Perlis
DOI
10.1063/5.0044684
Abstract
Brain-computer interface (BCI) system is a system of receiving information and transferring responses by communication between a computer and human brain. BCI system acts as assistive device to help the severe motor disabilities patients to live like a normal human being. Classification results used to validate the performances of BCI system. Several classification methods have been used in BCI system. However, previous researchers did not compare the classification results with predicted results. In this study, the predicted results were calculated from the questionnaire which collected from participants after completed the experiments. These predicted results were used to compare with the results from classification learner tool. The built-in classification methods included decision tree, support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbor (KNN) and ensemble classifiers. Based on the results, the average difference of predicted results and built-in classification results for cubic SVM is the smallest which is 2.41% and 1.81% for motor imagery 1 and motor imagery 2 respectively. This finding shows that the cubic SVM classifier can detect the mistake that did by the subjects during the experiment.
File(s)
Research repository notification.pdf (4.4 MB)
google-scholar
Views
Downloads
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Policies