Options
Shayfull Zamree Abd. Rahim
Preferred name
Shayfull Zamree Abd. Rahim
Official Name
Shayfull Zamree, Abd. Rahim
Alternative Name
Shayfull, Zamree Abd Rahim
Abd Rahim, Shayfull Zamree Abd
Shayfull, Zamree
Abd Rahim, S. Z.
Abd Rahim, Shayfull Zamree Bin
Bin Abd Rahim, S. Zamree
Abd Rahim, S.
zamree bin abd Rahim, Shayfull
Rahim, Shayfull Zamree Abd
Zamree Abd Rahim, Shayfull
Zambree, Shayfull
Rahim, Shayfull Z.B.Abd
Zamree, A. R.Shayfull
Shayfull, Z.
Main Affiliation
Scopus Author ID
54941291700
Researcher ID
I-2840-2019
Now showing
1 - 1 of 1
-
PublicationOptimisation of shrinkage and strength on thick plate part using recycled LDPE materials( 2021)
;Norshahira Roslan ;Abdellah El-hadj Abdellah ;Katarzyna Błoch ;Paweł Pietrusiewicz ;Marcin Nabiałek ;Janusz Szmidla ;Dariusz Kwiatkowski ;Joel Oliveira Correia VascoAchieving good quality of products from plastic injection moulding processes is very challenging, since the process comprises many affecting parameters. Common defects such as warpage are hard to avoid, and the defective parts will eventually go to waste, leading to unnecessary costs to the manufacturer. The use of recycled material from postindustrial waste has been studied by a few researchers. However, the application of an optimisation method by which to optimise processing parameters to mould parts using recycled materials remains lacking. In this study, Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Particle Swarm Optimisation (PSO) methods were conducted on thick plate parts moulded using virgin and recycled low-density polyethylene (LDPE) materials (100:0, 70:30, 60:40 and 50:50; virgin to recycle material ratios) to find the optimal input parameters for each of the material ratios. Shrinkage in the x and y directions increased in correlation with the recycled ratio, compared to virgin material. Meanwhile, the tensile strength of the thick plate part continued to decrease when the recycled ratio increased. R30 (70:30) had the optimum shrinkage in the x direction with respect to R0 (100:0) material where the shrinkage increased by 24.49% (RSM) and 33.20% (PSO). On the other hand, the shrinkage in the y direction for R30 material increased by 4.48% (RSM) and decreased by 2.67% (PSO), while the tensile strength of R30 (70:30) material decreased by 0.51% (RSM) and 2.68% (PSO) as compared to R0 (100:0) material. Validation tests indicated that the optimal setting of processing parameter suggested by PSO and RSM for R0 (100:0), R30 (70:30), R40 (60:40) and R50 (50:50) was less than 10%.