Options
A study on physical separation processes for recovery metals from waste printed circuit boards (PCBs)
Date Issued
2011
Abstract
In view of increasing the waste PCBs, a physical separation process has been carried out to recover metals from waste PCBs. This research is aimed to implement an effective and environmental friendly recovery particularly cooper (Cu) of waste PCBs. The physical separation process begins with comminution to produce controlled particle size. Then, the separation process was divided into two parts according optimum efficiencies at specific size range. The size fraction -600+300µm and -1180+600µm were separated by gravity separation using Mozley laboratory separator. Afterwards, an enrichment step of concentrate fraction was done by magnetic separation using rare-earth roll magnetic separator. Meanwhile, the size fraction -150µm, -300+150µm, and -600+300µm were separated to froth flotation using Denver D-12 laboratory flotation cell. Characterisations of waste PCBs were performed by micrographic analysis and elemental analysis. A qualitative micrographic analysis was conducted using stereo- zoom microscope, optical microscope, and scanning electron microscopy. An elemental analysis was conducted using atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) analysis and energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS). Regarding on the particle size analysis, maximising recovery of physical separation is done by targeting recovery in a controlled four size range fraction; -150µm, -150+300µm, - 300+600µm and -600+1180µm. A qualitative liberation assessment of the waste PCBs particle was establish unliberated particles still remain in the waste PCBs fines (-75µm). As the highest metal element in waste PCBs, copper (Cu) recovery (R) and enrichment ratio (ER) was discussed with more emphasis in this project. By Mozley laboratory separator, Cu recovery increase from 80.85% (ER 2.07) at -600+300µm size fraction to 89.65% (1.93) at -1180+600µm size. Thus, the efficiency of gravity separation increases with increasing particle size. A significant of the low recovery at finer size fraction implies valuable metal loss at this size range, thereby be evidence that it is not very effective for finer particles (- 300µm) was recovered by Mozley laboratory separator. For enrichment step using Rareearth roll magnetic separator showed the enrichment ratio (ER) was highly improved. At - 600+300µm non-magnetic fraction, Cu enrichment ratio is 2.51 and 2.15 at -1180+600µm size fraction. Through the reverse froth flotation, higher Cu recovery (R) and lower Cu enrichment ratio (ER) are noticeably with increasing particle size fraction for both flotation conditions (with and without frother). Thus, the efficiency of froth flotation is higher at finer size fraction. At -75µm size fraction, Cu recovery is 84.66% (ER 3.03) under natural hydrophobic responds (without frother). Meanwhile with frother addition, Cu recovery is 82.16% (ER 3.37). In view of frother addition, there is improved in enrichment ratio but poor recovery percentage. Overall, the approach physical separation has high efficiency, easy to run and at same could recover metals and non-metals. It is expected that physical separation process will be developed for the upgrading of metals recovery in waste PCBs.