Options
Norshah Aizat Shuaib
Preferred name
Norshah Aizat Shuaib
Official Name
Norshah Aizat, Shuaib
Alternative Name
Shuaib, Norshah A.
Shuaib, N. A.
Shuaib, Norshah Aizat bin
Main Affiliation
Scopus Author ID
25628938500
Researcher ID
AAM-7559-2021
Now showing
1 - 2 of 2
-
PublicationChemical coating techniques to enhance the surface quality of 3D printing (FDM) part: A short review( 2024-03-07)
;Khalid M. ;Dolah M.S.Morsidi M.The staircase effect describes the overall print surface roughness indicated through the layer by layer of Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM), also known as the Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) process. Due to the poor surface finish, post-processing can improve the aesthetic effect. The different post-processing procedures for FDM parts are classified as material removal and material addition. This paper reviews four types of material addition methods based on chemical coating post-processing techniques; gap filling, coating spray, plating, and water transfer printing of based on production time, cost and related environmental issues. From the review, spray coating generally is cost-effective and less hazardous to the environment. The paper presents a benchmark between the available material addition techniques as a post-processing step for the FDM printed parts. -
PublicationSANDBLASTING POST-PROCESSING ANALYSIS TO IMPROVE OF FUSED FILAMENT FABRICATIONS PARTS( 2023-01-01)
;Khalid M.Sandblasting is a post-processing process that is required to improve the surface due to the layered nature of fused filament fabrication parts. This paper presents preliminary work based on full factorial design of experiment, considering pressure (100 kPa and 700 kPa), time (10 s and 120 s), distance (10 mm and 370 mm) and aluminium oxide abrasive which is 106 µm and 29.5 µm of particles size as the input factors. The effect of the parameters on the surface roughness (Sa) for flat and curve surface, material usage and energy consumption allow were analysed. The result shows that both Sa for flat and Sa curve surface were highly influenced by the abrasive particles size and time with the highest changes of Sa for flat and curve reaches up to 2.825 µm and 6.090 µm respectively. This study provides information on how sandblasting parameters should be selected in improving surface quality and resource usage.15 2